linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7152: Rename misspelled RESEVERD -> RESERVED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOeBkLogWyxbB3ZNwZh9=6xVUKxmT1YGZQseAx4uo7a4u+M+gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:46:58 -0200
From:   Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@...il.com>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Cc:     lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, knaack.h@....de,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-usp@...glegroups.com, Rafael Tsuha <rafael.tsuha@....br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7152: Rename misspelled RESEVERD -> RESERVED

Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 às 06:20, Alexandru Ardelean
<ardeleanalex@...il.com> escreveu:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:35 PM Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Remove the checkpatch.pl check:
> >
> > CHECK: 'RESEVERD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RESERVED'?
>
> Hey,

Hi,

Thanks for answering.

> A bit curios about this one.
> Are you using this chip/driver ?

No, I am just a student at USP (University of São Paulo) starting in Linux
Kernel and a new member of the USP Linux Kernel group that has contributed
for a few months.

> Thing is: the part is nearing EOL, and it could be an idea to be
> marked for removal (since it's still in staging).
> But if there are users for this driver, it could be left around for a while.

This is my first patch in Linux Kernel, but if the driver will be removed, I
can send a patch for another driver. Is there any driver that I can
fix a style warning?

Thanks


Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 às 06:20, Alexandru Ardelean
<ardeleanalex@...il.com> escreveu:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:35 PM Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Remove the checkpatch.pl check:
> >
> > CHECK: 'RESEVERD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RESERVED'?
>
> Hey,
>
> A bit curios about this one.
> Are you using this chip/driver ?
>
> Thing is: the part is nearing EOL, and it could be an idea to be
> marked for removal (since it's still in staging).
> But if there are users for this driver, it could be left around for a while.
>
> Thanks
> Alex
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Tsuha <rafael.tsuha@....br>
> > ---
> > This macro is not used anywhere. Should we just correct the
> > spelling or remove the macro?
> >
> >  drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c
> > index 25f51db..c9da6d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> >  #define AD7152_REG_CH2_GAIN_HIGH       12
> >  #define AD7152_REG_CH2_SETUP           14
> >  #define AD7152_REG_CFG                 15
> > -#define AD7152_REG_RESEVERD            16
> > +#define AD7152_REG_RESERVED            16
> >  #define AD7152_REG_CAPDAC_POS          17
> >  #define AD7152_REG_CAPDAC_NEG          18
> >  #define AD7152_REG_CFG2                        26
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >