[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1549666628.10972.51.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:57:09 +0000
From: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
To: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz" <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"sbauer@...donthack.me" <sbauer@...donthack.me>,
"jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de"
<jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/16] block: sed-opal: unify space check in
add_token_*
On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 22:07 +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:50:10PM +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> > > From: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
> > >
> > > All add_token_* functions have a common set of conditions that have to
> > > be checked. Use a common function for those checks in order to avoid
> > > different behaviour as well as code duplication.
> > >
> > > Co-authored-by: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
> > > Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
> > > ---
> > > block/sed-opal.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
> > > index 5c123a5b4ab1..980705681806 100644
> > > --- a/block/sed-opal.c
> > > +++ b/block/sed-opal.c
> > > @@ -510,15 +510,29 @@ static int opal_discovery0(struct opal_dev *dev, void *data)
> > > return opal_discovery0_end(dev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void add_token_u8(int *err, struct opal_dev *cmd, u8 tok)
> > > +static size_t remaining_size(struct opal_dev *cmd)
> > > +{
> > > + return IO_BUFFER_LENGTH - cmd->pos;
> > > +}
> >
> > This function seem a little pointless to me, at least as of this patch
> > where it only has a single user just below.
>
> It is eventually used for the second time in 11/16 block: sed-opal: ioctl
> for writing to shadow mbr.
>
> If you feel strongly about this I can exclude it from this commit and
> introduce it in 11/16 (where it then will called from here and from
> write_shadow_mbr).
>
> Best regards,
> David
I'd prefer this option where we refactor later
Otherwise looks good
Reviewed-by Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3278 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists