[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213150542.552adeb1@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:05:42 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: lpddr_cmds: Mark expected switch fall-through
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:31:31 -0600
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c: In function ‘chip_ready’:
> drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:319:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (mode == FL_READY && chip->oldstate == FL_READY)
> ^
> drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:322:2: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
You sent me that one twice, is that expected? Is this a new version,
and in that case, what has changed?
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c b/drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
> index b13557fe52bd..76a4c73e100e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static int chip_ready(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, int mode)
> /* Only if there's no operation suspended... */
> if (mode == FL_READY && chip->oldstate == FL_READY)
> return 0;
> + /* fall through */
>
> default:
> sleep:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists