linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190227235535.GA24395@bogus>
Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:55:35 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander
 (STMFX) core bindings

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.