lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:38:58 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
        airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm: atmel-hlcdc: add config option for clock
 selection

Hi Claudiu

One more reply to this patch...

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:24:16PM +0000, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> 
> SAM9x60 LCD Controller has no option to select clock source as previous
> controllers have. To be able to use the same driver even for this LCD
> controller add a config option to know if controller supports this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h   |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index 8070a558d7b1..17a7a18f6a07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  	unsigned long mode_rate;
>  	struct videomode vm;
>  	unsigned long prate;
> -	unsigned int cfg;
> +	unsigned int mask = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK | ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKPOL;
> +	unsigned int cfg = 0;
>  	int div;
>  
>  	vm.vfront_porch = adj->crtc_vsync_start - adj->crtc_vdisplay;
> @@ -101,7 +102,10 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  		     (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
>  		     ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
>  
> -	cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +	if (!crtc->dc->desc->fixed_clksrc) {
> +		cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +		mask |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +	}
Maybe this is just too late to look at code, but I do not get this.
If the sam9x60 do not support selecting the clk rate then I assume it is either
fixed to used system clock or 2 x system clock.

And we have in the driver code to adjust the "div" value.
The value of div depends on the CLKSEL configuration, so there must
be one part of this that is not valid when fixed_clksrc is true.

>  
>  	prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
>  	mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
> @@ -132,9 +136,7 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  
>  	cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);

It is the following code (not visible in this patch I talk about:
       if (div < 2) {
                div = 2;
        } else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
                /* The divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate. */
                cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
                prate /= 2;
                div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
                if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
                        div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
        } else {
                int div_low = prate / mode_rate;

                if (div_low >= 2 &&
                    ((prate / div_low - mode_rate) <
                     10 * (mode_rate - prate / div)))
                        /*
                         * At least 10 times better when using a higher
                         * frequency than requested, instead of a lower.
                         * So, go with that.
                         */
                        div = div_low;
        }

Am I missing something obvious?

> -	regmap_update_bits(regmap, ATMEL_HLCDC_CFG(0),
> -			   ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL | ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK |
> -			   ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKPOL, cfg);
> +	regmap_update_bits(regmap, ATMEL_HLCDC_CFG(0), mask, cfg);
>  
>  	cfg = 0;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
> index 70bd540d644e..0155efb9c443 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
> @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ atmel_hlcdc_layer_to_plane(struct atmel_hlcdc_layer *layer)
>   * @max_hpw: maximum horizontal back/front porch width
>   * @conflicting_output_formats: true if RGBXXX output formats conflict with
>   *				each other.
> + * @fixed_clksrc: true if clock source is fixed
Be specific here. Tell if "fixed_clksrc == true" equals system clock or 2 x system clock.

	Sam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists