[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190307165433.GA90983@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:54:33 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, atishp04@...il.com,
dancol@...gle.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Manoj Rao <linux@...ojrajarao.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, qais.yousef@....com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to
extend the kernel
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:23:03PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:10 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> > > <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> > > > Introduce in-kernel headers and other artifacts which are made available
> > > > as an archive through proc (/proc/kheaders.tar.xz file). This archive makes
> > > > it possible to build kernel modules, run eBPF programs, and other
> > > > tracing programs that need to extend the kernel for tracing purposes
> > > > without any dependency on the file system having headers and build
> > > > artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > On Android and embedded systems, it is common to switch kernels but not
> > > > have kernel headers available on the file system. Raw kernel headers
> > > > also cannot be copied into the filesystem like they can be on other
> > > > distros, due to licensing and other issues. There's no linux-headers
> > > > package on Android. Further once a different kernel is booted, any
> > > > headers stored on the file system will no longer be useful. By storing
> > > > the headers as a compressed archive within the kernel, we can avoid these
> > > > issues that have been a hindrance for a long time.
> > > >
> > > > The feature is also buildable as a module just in case the user desires
> > > > it not being part of the kernel image. This makes it possible to load
> > > > and unload the headers on demand. A tracing program, or a kernel module
> > > > builder can load the module, do its operations, and then unload the
> > > > module to save kernel memory. The total memory needed is 3.8MB.
> > > >
> > > > The code to read the headers is based on /proc/config.gz code and uses
> > > > the same technique to embed the headers.
> > > >
> > > > To build a module, the below steps have been tested on an x86 machine:
> > > > modprobe kheaders
> > > > rm -rf $HOME/headers
> > > > mkdir -p $HOME/headers
> > > > tar -xvf /proc/kheaders.tar.xz -C $HOME/headers >/dev/null
> > > > cd my-kernel-module
> > > > make -C $HOME/headers M=$(pwd) modules
> > > > rmmod kheaders
> > >
> > > As the usage pattern will be accessing the individual files, what about
> > > implementing a file system that provides read-only access to the internal
> > > kheaders archive?
> > >
> > > mount kheaders $HOME/headers -t kheaders
> >
> > I thought about it already. This is easier said than done though. The archive
> > is compressed from 40MB to 3.6MB. If we leave it uncompressed in RAM, then it
> > will take up the entire 40MB of RAM and in Android we don't even use
> > disk-based swap.
> >
> > So we will need some kind of intra file compressed memory representation that
> > a filesystem can use for the backing store. I thought of RAM-backed squashfs
> > but it requires squashfs-tools to be installed at build time (which my host
> > distro itself didn't have).
> >
> > It is just so much easier to use tar + xz at build time, and leave the
> > decompression task to the user. After decompression, the files will live on
> > the disk and the page-cache mechanism will free memory when/if the files fall
> > off the LRUs.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> I think the compressed tarball is much simpler/easier overall. If
> someone really wants the filesystem, they just uncompress it into a
> tmpfs mount. It's much less moving kernel code to worry about.
Agreed, I also feel the same. thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists