[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <11B50B8B-7A27-4BFD-B0C6-669C74381B46@umn.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 22:08:37 -0500
From: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
To: kjlu@....edu
Cc: pakki001@....edu, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memstick: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference
Hi Maxim,
Can you review this patch?
Thanks,
> On Mar 9, 2019, at 1:59 AM, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu> wrote:
>
> In case alloc_ordered_workqueue fails, the fix returns ENOMEM to
> avoid potential NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> ---
> drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
> index 82daccc9ea62..8e00de414567 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
> @@ -2149,6 +2149,11 @@ static int msb_init_disk(struct memstick_dev *card)
>
> msb->usage_count = 1;
> msb->io_queue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ms_block", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
> + if (!msb->io_queue) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_put_disk;
> + }
> +
> INIT_WORK(&msb->io_work, msb_io_work);
> sg_init_table(msb->prealloc_sg, MS_BLOCK_MAX_SEGS+1);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists