linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: lpfc: Make some symbols static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1imtkrcd4.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:32:07 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     <james.smart@...adcom.com>, <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <jsmart2021@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: lpfc: Make some symbols static


YueHaibing,

> Fix sparse warnings:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c:115:1: warning: symbol 'lpfc_sli4_pcimem_bcopy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c:7854:1: warning: symbol 'lpfc_sli4_process_missed_mbox_completions' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c:223:27: warning: symbol 'lpfc_nvmet_get_ctx_for_xri' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c:245:27: warning: symbol 'lpfc_nvmet_get_ctx_for_oxid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:75:10: warning: symbol 'lpfc_present_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?

Applied to 5.3/scsi-queue. Thanks.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering