linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: add support to unlock flash device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <70732c8e-111f-7c46-9e93-11894d944a1d@ti.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jun 2019 18:35:16 +0530
From:   Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>,
        <marek.vasut@...il.com>, <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     <palmer@...ive.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <wesley@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: add support to unlock flash device



On 12-Jun-19 4:17 PM, Sagar Shrikant Kadam wrote:
> Nor device (is25wp256 mounted on HiFive unleashed Rev A00 board) from ISSI
> have memory blocks guarded by block protection bits BP[0,1,2,3].
> 
> Clearing block protection bits,unlocks the flash memory regions
> The unlock scheme is registered during nor scans.
> 
> Based on code developed by Wesley Terpstra <wesley@...ive.com>
> and/or Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>.
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-linux/commit/c94e267766d62bc9a669611c3d0c8ed5ea26569b
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h   |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index 2d5a925..b7c6261 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -1461,6 +1461,49 @@ static int macronix_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * issi_unlock() - clear BP[0123] write-protection.
> + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'.
> + * @ofs: offset from which to unlock memory.
> + * @len: number of bytes to unlock.
> + *
> + * Bits [2345] of the Status Register are BP[0123].
> + * ISSI chips use a different block protection scheme than other chips.
> + * Just disable the write-protect unilaterally.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
> + */
> +static int issi_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +{
> +	int ret, val;
> +	u8 mask = SR_BP0 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP2 | SR_BP3;
> +
> +	val = read_sr(nor);
> +	if (val < 0)
> +		return val;
> +	if (!(val & mask))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	write_enable(nor);
> +
> +	write_sr(nor, val & ~mask);
> +
> +	ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = read_sr(nor);
> +	if (ret > 0 && !(ret & mask)) {
> +		dev_info(nor->dev,
> +			"ISSI Block Protection Bits cleared SR=0x%x", ret);
> +		ret = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(nor->dev, "ISSI Block Protection Bits not cleared\n");
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * spansion_quad_enable() - set QE bit in Configuraiton Register.
>   * @nor:	pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
>   *
> @@ -1836,7 +1879,7 @@ static int sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  			SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>  	{ "is25wp256", INFO(0x9d7019, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024,
>  			SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
> -			SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES)
> +			SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK)
>  	},
>  
>  	/* Macronix */
> @@ -4080,6 +4123,12 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
>  		nor->flash_is_locked = stm_is_locked;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* NOR protection support for ISSI chips */
> +	if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SNOR_MFR_ISSI ||
> +	    info->flags & SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) {

This should be:

	if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SNOR_MFR_ISSI &&
	    info->flags & SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) {

Otherwise you would end up overriding nor->flash_unlock function for
other vendors too, right?

> +		nor->flash_unlock = issi_unlock;
> +

No need for blank line here.
Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict on all patches and address
all the issues reported by it.



> +	}
>  	if (nor->flash_lock && nor->flash_unlock && nor->flash_is_locked) {
>  		mtd->_lock = spi_nor_lock;
>  		mtd->_unlock = spi_nor_unlock;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> index ff13297..9a7d719 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
>  #define SR_BP0			BIT(2)	/* Block protect 0 */
>  #define SR_BP1			BIT(3)	/* Block protect 1 */
>  #define SR_BP2			BIT(4)	/* Block protect 2 */
> +#define SR_BP3			BIT(5)	/* Block protect 3 for ISSI device*/

No need to mention ISSI here. I am sure there are devices from other
vendors with BP3

>  #define SR_TB			BIT(5)	/* Top/Bottom protect */
>  #define SR_SRWD			BIT(7)	/* SR write protect */
>  /* Spansion/Cypress specific status bits */
> 

Regards
Vignesh