[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190722220645.C51BC219BE@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:06:44 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"van.freenix@...il.com" <van.freenix@...il.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx8mm: fix audio pll setting
Quoting Peng Fan (2019-07-14 19:55:43)
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> The AUDIO PLL max support 650M, so the original clk settings violate
> spec. This patch makes the output 786432000 -> 393216000,
> and 722534400 -> 361267200 to aligned with NXP vendor kernel without any
> impact on audio functionality and go within 650MHz PLL limit.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Fixes: ba5625c3e272 ("clk: imx: Add clock driver support for imx8mm")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
Is this a problem right now, i.e. should I apply this to clk-fixes? Or
can this wait until next merge window?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists