[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907261409260.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] vmpressure: Use spinlock_t instead of struct
spinlock
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Polite reminder ...
> For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct
> spinlock".
>
> Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition.
>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/vmpressure.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmpressure.h b/include/linux/vmpressure.h
> index 61e6fddfb26fd..6d28bc433c1cf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmpressure.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmpressure.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct vmpressure {
> unsigned long tree_scanned;
> unsigned long tree_reclaimed;
> /* The lock is used to keep the scanned/reclaimed above in sync. */
> - struct spinlock sr_lock;
> + spinlock_t sr_lock;
>
> /* The list of vmpressure_event structs. */
> struct list_head events;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists