[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4ku+3FVOYr7Gvh-Yrdhvw2cfntbnEkhONYGbC71UmCgZA-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:10:02 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, weicx@...eadst.com,
sherry.zong@...soc.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: spi: sprd: Change the hwlock support to
be optional
Hi Mark,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 19:29, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 03:20:53PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > No need to add hardware spinlock proctection due to add multiple
> > msater channel, so change it to be optional in documentation.
>
> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
> makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
The subject lines format 'dt-bindings: xxx' was recommended by Rob, so
I am not sure if I need to change the format as 'spi: sprd:'? Thanks.
--
Baolin Wang
Best Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists