lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4ku+3FVOYr7Gvh-Yrdhvw2cfntbnEkhONYGbC71UmCgZA-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:10:02 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, weicx@...eadst.com,
        sherry.zong@...soc.com,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: spi: sprd: Change the hwlock support to
 be optional

Hi Mark,

On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 19:29, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 03:20:53PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > No need to add hardware spinlock proctection due to add multiple
> > msater channel, so change it to be optional in documentation.
>
> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.

The subject lines format 'dt-bindings: xxx' was recommended by Rob, so
I am not sure if I need to change the format as 'spi: sprd:'? Thanks.

-- 
Baolin Wang
Best Regards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ