linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Add LLCC support for SC7180 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2fbab8bc38be37fba976d34b2f89e720@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:30:21 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Add LLCC support for SC7180 SoC

Hi Rob,

On 2019-10-24 01:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:32 PM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat 19 Oct 04:37 PDT 2019, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> 
>> > LLCC behaviour is controlled by the configuration data set
>> > in the llcc-qcom driver, add the same for SC7180 SoC.
>> > Also convert the existing bindings to json-schema and add
>> > the compatible for SC7180 SoC.
>> >
>> 
>> Thanks for the patches and thanks for the review Stephen. Series 
>> applied
> 
> And they break dt_binding_check. Please fix.
> 

I did check this and think that the error log from dt_binding_check is 
not valid because it says cache-level is a required property [1], but 
there is no such property in LLCC bindings.

[1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1179800/

-Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation