[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLVEwTjNe6y9xLLv9ib8qnp6hFXsT+XS2bJT0jRTzZVdsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:03:05 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>, Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] mm: cma: Export cma symbols for cma heap as a module
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:12 PM <sspatil@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:33PM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > #endif
> >
> > struct cma *dma_contiguous_default_area;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_contiguous_default_area);
>
> I didn't need to do this for the (out-of-tree) ion cma heap [1].
> Any reason why you had to?
Its likely due to the changes I made in the separate
non-default-CMA-region patch set. Earlier I had gotten away with just
your change, but in testing before I sent this series, I hit the build
error and quickly added the export before sending.
I'll revise and respin this. Mostly just wanting to get initial
feedback on the dmabuf-heaps-as-modules bit, so I didn't take as much
care as I should have with the exports here.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists