[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191101144921.GA10409@kadam>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 17:49:21 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>, Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Dros Adamson <dros@...marydata.com>,
jeff.layton@...marydata.com, richard.sharpe@...marydata.com,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] nfsd: Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it
declares is never used.
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:36:27AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Mao-
>
> > On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > The declarations were introduced with the file, but the declared
> > variables were not used.
> >
> > Fixes: 65294c1f2c5e ("nfsd: add a new struct file caching facility to nfsd")
>
> I'm not sure a Fixes: tag is necessary here? 65294c1f2c5e
> works fine without this change, and it's not something we
> would need to backport into stable kernels.
>
> This is more of a clean up patch.
>
Fixes is not really related to backports or stable. I would agree that
this isn't a bug but just a cleanup, but the problem is that other
people want Fixes tags for everything...
Yesterday I sent a cleanup patch and I almost put the Fixes tag under
the --- cut off but in the end I just deleted it... It's hard to know
what the right thing is.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists