[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112180623.GI3797@yoga>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:06:23 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
s-anna@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] remoteproc/omap: add support for system
suspend/resume
On Tue 12 Nov 00:45 PST 2019, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 12/11/2019 08:15, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 28 Oct 05:42 PDT 2019, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> > [..]
> > > +static int _omap_rproc_suspend(struct rproc *rproc)
> >
> > I think it would make sense to inline this and _omap_rproc_resume() in
> > their single call sites.
>
> Well, these get re-used in following patch for runtime PM also, so it is
> probably better leave this for compiler to decide?
>
I didn't see that until later, this is fine.
Regards,
Bjorn
> >
> > [..]
> > > +static int _omap_rproc_resume(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > +{
> > [..]
> > > @@ -806,6 +972,14 @@ static int omap_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > oproc->num_timers);
> > > }
> > > + init_completion(&oproc->pm_comp);
> > > +
> > > + oproc->fck = of_clk_get(np, 0);
> >
> > devm_clk_get() ?
> >
> > Otherwise I think you're lacking a clk_put() in omap_rproc_remove()
>
> Yeah, let me replace with devm_clk_get.
>
> -Tero
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
>
> --
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists