[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f06bf1967bdf43ca9b218f9b5c5202a6@EX13D32EUC003.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:02:37 +0000
From: "Durrant, Paul" <pdurrant@...zon.com>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
CC: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] block/xen-blkback: allow module to be cleanly
unloaded
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
> Sent: 29 November 2019 15:00
> To: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@...zon.com>
> Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; xen-
> devel@...ts.xenproject.org; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>; Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block/xen-blkback: allow module to be cleanly
> unloaded
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:43:06PM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > Add a module_exit() to perform the necessary clean-up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>
>
> LGTM:
>
> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
>
Thanks.
> AFAICT we should make sure this is not committed before patch 1, or
> else you could unload a blkback module that's still in use?
>
Yes, that's correct.
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists