[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191216211228.153485-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:12:28 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: linux@...inikbrodowski.net
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init: use do_mount() instead of ksys_mount()
Shouldn't patches bake for a while in -next? (That way we catch regressions
before they hit mainline?)
This lit up our CI this morning.
https://travis-ci.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/builds
(Apologies for missing context, replying via lore.kernel.org directions.)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191212135724.331342-4-linux@dominikbrodowski.net/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists