[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191217063846.GA3247@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:38:46 +0100
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init: use do_mount() instead of ksys_mount()
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:12:28PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Shouldn't patches bake for a while in -next? (That way we catch regressions
> before they hit mainline?)
>
> This lit up our CI this morning.
>
> https://travis-ci.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/builds
>
> (Apologies for missing context, replying via lore.kernel.org directions.)
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191212135724.331342-4-linux@dominikbrodowski.net/
A fix for this issue is already upstream, 7de7de7ca0ae .
Thanks,
Dominik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists