[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158154899499.184098.8708399326565910374@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:09:54 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, jshriram@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
mturquette@...libre.com, psodagud@...eaurora.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tdas@...eaurora.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
vinod.koul@...aro.org, vnkgutta@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Refactor and cleanup trion PLL
Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2020-01-24 14:32:23)
> From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>
> The PLL run and standby modes are similar across the PLLs, thus rename
> and refactor the code accordingly.
>
> Remove duplicate function for calculating the round rate of PLL and also
> update the trion pll ops to use the common function.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta <vnkgutta@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 71 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
Looks mostly ok but it's wrecked now by me. Can you resend, splitting
this patch into at least two things? One patch to replace defines with
standard names and another to do the rest that this patch does?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists