[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4f2ad65-0634-f825-b0b7-7e4cd2dc697f@c-s.fr>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:59:35 +0100
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] powerpc: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()
Le 12/02/2020 à 09:04, afzal mohammed a écrit :
> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Existing callers of
> setup_irq() reached mostly via 'init_IRQ()' & 'time_init()', while
> memory allocators are ready by 'mm_init()'.
>
> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
> ready by the time early interrupts were initialized.
>
> Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq().
>
> Seldom remove_irq() usage has been observed coupled with setup_irq(),
> wherever that has been found, it too has been replaced by free_irq().
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191609480.1971@nanos
>
> Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr> # for the 8xx parts
> ---
>
> Since cc'ing cover letter to all maintainers/reviewers would be too
> many, refer for cover letter,
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1581478323.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds.c | 10 +++-----
> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/cpm1.c | 9 ++-----
> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c | 9 ++-----
> arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c | 14 ++++------
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c | 31 ++++++++++-------------
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c | 9 ++-----
> 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists