| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <270c7bad-0d68-4496-c83f-f491c38b4992@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 11:02:43 +0200
From: "Hawa, Hanna" <hhhawa@...zon.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <mchehab@...nel.org>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <james.morse@....com>,
<rrichter@...vell.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<frowand.list@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, <benh@...zon.com>, <ronenk@...zon.com>,
<talel@...zon.com>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>, <hanochu@...zon.com>,
<barakw@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] edac: Add support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs L1
EDAC
On 2/25/2020 8:52 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Hanna Hawa wrote:
>
>> Adds support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs L1 EDAC driver to detect and
>> report L1 errors.
>
> You don't add support for a driver - you either add a driver or you add
> support for HW...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/al_l1_edac.c b/drivers/edac/al_l1_edac.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..723b35b18f5b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/al_l1_edac.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <asm/sysreg.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/smp.h>
>
> asm/ includes go after linux/ includes.
Will be fixed
>
>> +
>> +#include "edac_device.h"
>> +#include "edac_module.h"
>> +
>> +#define DRV_NAME "al_l1_edac"
>> +
>> +/* Same bit assignments of CPUMERRSR_EL1 in ARM CA57/CA72 */
>> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 1, 15, 2, 2)
>> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_RAM_ID GENMASK(30, 24)
>> +#define ARM_CA57_L1_I_TAG_RAM 0x00
>> +#define ARM_CA57_L1_I_DATA_RAM 0x01
>> +#define ARM_CA57_L1_D_TAG_RAM 0x08
>> +#define ARM_CA57_L1_D_DATA_RAM 0x09
>> +#define ARM_CA57_L2_TLB_RAM 0x18
>> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_VALID BIT(31)
>> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_REPEAT GENMASK_ULL(39, 32)
>> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_OTHER GENMASK_ULL(47, 40)
>> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_FATAL BIT_ULL(63)
>> +
>> +#define AL_L1_EDAC_MSG_MAX 256
>> +
>> +static void al_l1_edac_cpumerrsr_read_status(void *arg)
>
> This is a static function so you don't really need a function prefix of
> "al_l1_edac_". Use those chars to make its name more descriptive. Ditto
> for the rest of the static functions in that file.
Will be fixed.
>
>> +{
>> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev = arg;
>> + int cpu, space, count;
>> + u32 ramid, repeat, other, fatal;
>> + u64 val;
>> + char msg[AL_L1_EDAC_MSG_MAX];
>> + char *p;
>> + spinlock_t *lock;
>
> Please sort function local variables declaration in a reverse christmas
> tree order:
>
> <type A> longest_variable_name;
> <type B> shorter_var_name;
> <type C> even_shorter;
> <type D> i;
Will be fixed
>
>> +
>> + val = read_sysreg_s(ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_EL1);
>> + if (!(FIELD_GET(ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_VALID, val)))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + write_sysreg_s(0, ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_EL1);
>> +
>> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> + ramid = FIELD_GET(ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_RAM_ID, val);
>> + repeat = FIELD_GET(ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_REPEAT, val);
>> + other = FIELD_GET(ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_OTHER, val);
>> + fatal = FIELD_GET(ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_FATAL, val);
>> +
>> + space = sizeof(msg);
>> + p = msg;
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, "CPU%d L1 %serror detected", cpu,
>> + (fatal) ? "Fatal " : "");
>> + p += count;
>> + space -= count;
>> +
>> + switch (ramid) {
>> + case ARM_CA57_L1_I_TAG_RAM:
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, " RAMID='L1-I Tag RAM'");
>> + break;
>> + case ARM_CA57_L1_I_DATA_RAM:
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, " RAMID='L1-I Data RAM'");
>> + break;
>> + case ARM_CA57_L1_D_TAG_RAM:
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, " RAMID='L1-D Tag RAM'");
>> + break;
>> + case ARM_CA57_L1_D_DATA_RAM:
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, " RAMID='L1-D Data RAM'");
>> + break;
>> + case ARM_CA57_L2_TLB_RAM:
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, " RAMID='L2 TLB RAM'");
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space, " RAMID='unknown'");
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + p += count;
>> + space -= count;
>> + count = scnprintf(p, space,
>> + " repeat=%d, other=%d (CPUMERRSR_EL1=0x%llx)",
>> + repeat, other, val);
>> +
>> + lock = edac_dev->pvt_info;
>
> That sure looks funky - why not use a proper private struct like the
> rest of the drivers?
Then the structure will include single variable..
>
>> + spin_lock(lock);
>> + if (fatal)
>> + edac_device_handle_ue_count(edac_dev, repeat, 0, 0, msg);
>> + else
>> + edac_device_handle_ce_count(edac_dev, repeat, 0, 0, msg);
>> + spin_unlock(lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void al_l1_edac_check(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev)
>> +{
>> + on_each_cpu(al_l1_edac_cpumerrsr_read_status, edac_dev, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int al_l1_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + spinlock_t *lock;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + edac_dev = edac_device_alloc_ctl_info(sizeof(*lock), DRV_NAME, 1, "L",
>> + 1, 1, NULL, 0,
>> + edac_device_alloc_index());
>> + if (!edac_dev)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + edac_dev->edac_check = al_l1_edac_check;
>> + edac_dev->dev = dev;
>> + edac_dev->mod_name = DRV_NAME;
>> + edac_dev->dev_name = dev_name(dev);
>> + edac_dev->ctl_name = "L1_cache";
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edac_dev);
>> + lock = edac_dev->pvt_info;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_init(lock);
>> +
>> + ret = edac_device_add_device(edac_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add L1 edac device (%d)\n", ret);
>> + edac_device_free_ctl_info(edac_dev);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int al_l1_edac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + edac_device_del_device(edac_dev->dev);
>> + edac_device_free_ctl_info(edac_dev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id al_l1_edac_of_match[] = {
>> + /*
>> + * "al,alpine-v2", and "amazon,al-alpine-v3" are machine compatible
>> + * strings which have Cortex-A57/A72 configured with this support,
>> + * and access to CPUMERRSR_EL1 register is enabled in firmware.
>> + */
>> + { .compatible = "al,alpine-v2" },
>
> Err, checkpatch says:
>
> WARNING: DT compatible string "al,alpine-v2" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #236: FILE: drivers/edac/al_l1_edac.c:151:
> + { .compatible = "al,alpine-v2" },
>
>
> Do you need a devicetree addition? I usually get such with the ARM EDAC
> drivers...
There is missing documentation for alpine-v2, there is an open patches
to add this missing doc. [1]
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/25/362
>
>> + { .compatible = "amazon,al-alpine-v3" },
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, al_l1_edac_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver al_l1_edac_driver = {
>> + .probe = al_l1_edac_probe,
>> + .remove = al_l1_edac_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = DRV_NAME,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_device *edac_l1_device;
>
> Please move to the top of the file.
Ack.
>
>> +
>> +static int __init al_l1_init(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *root;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>> + if (!root) {
>> + pr_debug("Can't find root node!\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!of_match_node(al_l1_edac_of_match, root))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = platform_driver_register(&al_l1_edac_driver);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to register %s (%d)\n", DRV_NAME, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + edac_l1_device = platform_device_register_simple(DRV_NAME, -1, NULL, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(edac_l1_device)) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to register EDAC AL L1 platform device\n");
>
> platform_driver_unregister() ?
Ack
>
>> + return PTR_ERR(edac_l1_device);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit al_l1_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + platform_device_unregister(edac_l1_device);
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&al_l1_edac_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +late_initcall(al_l1_init);
>
> Why not module_init() ?
Will be fixed.
Thanks,
Hanna
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists