linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] dt-bindings: clk: sprd: add bindings for sc9863a clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAfSe-s0gcehu0ZDj=FTe5S7CzAHC5mahXBH2fJm7mXS7Xys1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:05:33 +0800
From:   Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] dt-bindings: clk: sprd: add bindings for sc9863a
 clock controller

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 10:03, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Chunyan Zhang (2020-03-22 04:00:39)
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 09:12, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Chunyan Zhang (2020-03-03 23:27:26)
> > > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > > >
> > > > add a new bindings to describe sc9863a clock compatible string.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > > [...]
> > > > +examples:
> > > > +  - |
> > > > +    ap_clk: clock-controller@...00000 {
> > > > +      compatible = "sprd,sc9863a-ap-clk";
> > > > +      reg = <0 0x21500000 0 0x1000>;
> > > > +      clocks = <&ext_26m>, <&ext_32k>;
> > > > +      clock-names = "ext-26m", "ext-32k";
> > > > +      #clock-cells = <1>;
> > > > +    };
> > > > +
> > > > +  - |
> > > > +    soc {
> > > > +      #address-cells = <2>;
> > > > +      #size-cells = <2>;
> > > > +
> > > > +      ap_ahb_regs: syscon@...00000 {
> > > > +        compatible = "sprd,sc9863a-glbregs", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> > > > +        reg = <0 0x20e00000 0 0x4000>;
> > > > +        #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +        #size-cells = <1>;
> > > > +        ranges = <0 0 0x20e00000 0x4000>;
> > > > +
> > > > +        apahb_gate: apahb-gate@0 {
> > >
> > > Why do we need a node per "clk type" in the simple-mfd syscon? Can't we
> > > register clks from the driver that matches the parent node and have that
> > > driver know what sorts of clks are where? Sorry I haven't read the rest
> > > of the patch series and I'm not aware if this came up before. If so,
> > > please put details about this in the commit text.
> >
> > Please see the change logs after v2 in cover-letter.
> >
> > Rob suggested us to put some clocks under syscon nodes, since these
> > clocks have the same
> > physical address base with the syscon;
>
> Ok. I'll apply the series to clk-next then.

Thank you.

Chunyan