[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aac1e71953b564d48f2d1288e50924ebd7e3e98a.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:29:42 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/25] ocxl: Emit a log message showing how much LPC
memory was detected
On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 01:49 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:23 PM Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org> wrote:
> > This patch emits a message showing how much LPC memory & special purpose
> > memory was detected on an OCXL device.
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
[]
> > @@ -568,6 +568,10 @@ static int read_afu_lpc_memory_info(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > afu->special_purpose_mem_size =
> > total_mem_size - lpc_mem_size;
> > }
> > +
> > + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Probed LPC memory of %#llx bytes and special purpose memory of %#llx bytes\n",
> > + afu->lpc_mem_size, afu->special_purpose_mem_size);
>
> A patch for a single log message is too fine grained for my taste,
> let's squash this into another patch in the series.
Is the granularity of lpc_mem_size actually bytes?
Might this be better as KiB or something using functions
Maybe something like:
unsigned long si_val(unsigned long val)
{
static const char units[] = "BKMGTPE";
const char *unit = units;
while (!(val & 1023) && unit[1]) {
val >>= 10;
unit++;
}
return val;
}
char si_type(unsigned long val)
{
static const char units[] = "BKMGTPE";
const char *unit = units;
while (!(val & 1023) && unit[1]) {
val >>= 10;
unit++;
}
return *unit;
}
so this could be something like:
dev_info(&dev->dev, "Probed LPC memory of %#llu%c and special purpose memory of %#llu%c\n",
si_val(afu->lpc_mem_size), si_type(afu->lpc_mem_size),
si_val(afu->special_purpose_mem_size), si_type(afu->special_purpose_mem_size));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists