[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <620a61ed-be87-f60e-f562-379cd3adbe08@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:29:11 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/8] khugepaged: Drain LRU add pagevec after swapin
On 4/3/20 4:29 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> __collapse_huge_page_isolate() may fail due to extra pin in the LRU add
> pagevec. It's petty common for swapin case: we swap in pages just to
> fail due to the extra pin.
>
> Drain LRU add pagevec on sucessfull swapin.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index fdc10ffde1ca..57ff287caf6b 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -940,6 +940,11 @@ static bool __collapse_huge_page_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
> vmf.pte--;
> pte_unmap(vmf.pte);
> +
> + /* Drain LRU add pagevec to remove extra pin on the swapped in pages */
> + if (swapped_in)
> + lru_add_drain();
There is already lru_add_drain() called in swap readahead path, please
see swap_vma_readahead() and swap_cluster_readahead().
The extra call to draining lru seems unnecessary.
> +
> trace_mm_collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, swapped_in, referenced, 1);
> return true;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists