[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=hjh_MXDR05A5A8W3NwYSAwzf_ALYKyiAD4nRo1caKqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:29:36 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, bristot@...hat.com,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v3 09/17] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static
call implementation
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:04 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 06:08:59PM -0700, Fangrui Song wrote:
> > On 2020-03-24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > +#define ARCH_DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(name, func) \
> > > + asm(".pushsection .text, \"ax\" \n" \
> > > + ".align 4 \n" \
> > > + ".globl " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(name) " \n" \
> > > + STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(name) ": \n" \
> > > + " jmp.d32 " #func " \n" \
> > > + ".type " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(name) ", @function \n" \
> > > + ".size " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(name) ", . - " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(name) " \n" \
> > > + ".popsection \n")
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* _ASM_STATIC_CALL_H */
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Coming here from https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/974
> >
> > jmp.d32 is not recognized by clang integrated assembler.
> > The syntax appears to be very rarely used. According to Debian Code Search,
> > u-boot is the only project using this syntax.
>
> *groan*... I was going to use it in more places :-/
>
> > In March 2017, gas added the pseudo prefix {disp32}
> > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=86fa6981e7487e2c2df4337aa75ed2d93c32eaf2
> > which generalizes jmp.d32 ({disp32} jmp foo)
>
> That's all well and cute, but I can't use that because its too new. Not
> until we raise the minimum gcc/bintils version to something that
> includes that.
If it seems like it would be useful, let us know. If it doesn't have
some ridiculous baggage or inconsistency or unspecified behavior,
we're generally happy to do so. We have finite resources so knowing
where to focus our attention helps us sort the never ending TODO list.
It's not easy to predict which feature we'll need to drop everything
to implement next, so any help there would be much appreciated.
>
> > I wonder whether the instruction jmp.d32 can be replaced with the trick in
> > arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h for clang portability.
> >
> > % grep -A2 'jmp.d32' arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h
> > /* Equivalent to "jmp.d32 \target" */
> > .byte 0xe9
> > .long \target - .Lstatic_jump_after_\@
>
> Sure, but I was hoping to move away from that since all assemblers
> should now support jmp.d32. Except of course, you have to go ruin
> things.
>
> The thing is, jmp.d32 reads so much nicer than the above crap.
>
> Also, I still need a meta instruction like:
>
> nopjmp $label
>
> what works just like 'jmp' but instead emits either a nop2 or a nop5.
> I tried various hacks to get GAS to emit that, but no luck :/
>
> The only up-side from that new syntax is that I suppose we can go write:
>
> {disp8} push \vec
>
> without gas shitting itself and emitting a 5 byte push just because..
> Except of course we can't, for the same reason I can't go around and
> use:
>
> {disp32} jmp
>
> in the above code.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200406110438.GJ20730%40hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists