linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] MAINTAINERS: rectify EDAC-SIFIVE entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004131358020.7282@felia>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:00:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@....de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] MAINTAINERS: rectify EDAC-SIFIVE entry



On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> Looking at that a bit - I think the right thing to do is to remove that
> sifive_l2_cache.c file from the EDAC-SIFIVE file pattern because the
> edac driver is simply using the L2 thing to register on its notifier
> chain, i.e., using an external facility, like all the drivers do. And the
> l2_cache thing is not part of the edac driver.
> 

Thanks for the pointer.

I adjusted the patch, first accidently sent a broken PATCH v2 (which 
shall be ignored), but this PATCH v3 shall be picked:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200413115255.7100-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/


Lukas