linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] btrfs: use set/clear_fs_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200427055428.GB16709@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 26 Apr 2020 22:54:28 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hch@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] btrfs: use set/clear_fs_page_private

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:20:54AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >  void set_page_extent_mapped(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
> > -		SetPagePrivate(page);
> > -		get_page(page);
> > -		set_page_private(page, EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE);
> > -	}
> > +	if (!PagePrivate(page))
> > +		set_fs_page_private(page, (void *)EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE);
> 
> Change the definition of EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE so the cast is not
> needed? Nothing ever reads EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE; it's only there to
> set the private flag for other code to check and release the extent
> mapping reference to the page...

IIRC there as a patch on the btrfs list to remove EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE,
it might be better to not bother changing it.  Maybe the btrfs
maintainers remember this better.