lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b452dc29fb553fa5993b90131dcdbc04ed87532e.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:10:44 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Markus.Elfring@....de,
        mcroce@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] checkpatch: add dedicated checker for 'Fixes:' tag

On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 10:02 +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> According to submitting-patches.rst, 'Fixes:' tag has a little
> stricter condition about the one line summary:
> ...
> Do not split the tag across multiple
> lines, tags are exempt from the "wrap at 75 columns" rule in order to simplify
> parsing scripts
> ...
> 
> And there is no 'Fixes:' tag format checker in checkpatch to check
> the commit id length too, so let's add dedicated checker to check
> these conditions for 'Fixes:' tag.

There's no need to duplicate functionality like this.
Put this additional Fixes: logic into the existing block.

(and don't take advise from Markus too seriously when it
comes to English grammar or wording.  He is not an arbiter
of taste for this code)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ