[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b68419a6-65a9-08d0-bed8-5f8195ae3d55@st.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:37:58 +0200
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <ohad@...ery.com>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>
CC: <loic.pallardy@...com>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT
parsing
Hi Mathieu,
On 4/24/20 10:24 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the device tree
> since (1) there is no correlation between them and (2) to use the
> information that was gathered to make a decision on whether to
> synchronise with the M4 or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 1ac90adba9b1..57a426ea620b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -538,12 +538,11 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_syscon(struct device_node *np, const char *prop,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct stm32_rproc *ddata, bool *auto_boot)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> struct stm32_syscon tz;
> unsigned int tzen;
> int err, irq;
> @@ -589,7 +588,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> err = regmap_read(tz.map, tz.reg, &tzen);
> if (err) {
> - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
> return err;
> }
> ddata->secured_soc = tzen & tz.mask;
> @@ -605,7 +604,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> dev_info(dev, "failed to get pdds\n");
>
> - rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
> + *auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
>
> return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
> }
> @@ -616,6 +615,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct rproc *rproc;
> + bool auto_boot = false;
Nitpicking: Seems that you don't need to initialize it.
Perhaps you can simply suppress the local variable and directly use rproc->auto_boot.
else LGTM
Thanks,
Arnaud
> int ret;
>
> ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> @@ -626,9 +626,16 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!rproc)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + ddata = rproc->priv;
> +
> rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
> +
> + ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &auto_boot);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_rproc;
> +
> + rproc->auto_boot = auto_boot;
> rproc->has_iommu = false;
> - ddata = rproc->priv;
> ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
> if (!ddata->workqueue) {
> dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
> @@ -638,13 +645,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>
> - ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev);
> - if (ret)
> - goto free_wkq;
> -
> ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> if (ret)
> - goto free_rproc;
> + goto free_wkq;
>
> ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> if (ret)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists