lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514103259.tdfjc5ds4igpmoxj@wittgenstein>
Date:   Thu, 14 May 2020 12:32:59 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: enable HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS, switch to
 kernel_clone_args

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:21:13PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/14/20 12:19 PM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Scratch that. It's even worse. On ia64 it is _invalid_ to pass a NULL
> > stack. That's at least what the glibc assembly assumes:
> > 
> > 	cmp.eq p6,p0=0,in0
> > 	cmp.eq p7,p0=0,in1
> > 	mov r8=EINVAL
> > 	mov out0=in3		/* Flags are first syscall argument.	*/
> > 	mov out1=in1		/* Stack address.			*/
> > (p6)	br.cond.spnt.many __syscall_error	/* no NULL function pointers */
> > (p7)	br.cond.spnt.many __syscall_error	/* no NULL stack pointers */
> > 	;;
> > 	mov out2=in2		/* Stack size.				*/
> > 
> > so newer systemd just works by accident on ia64 if at all correctly
> > afaict.
> 
> Hmm, interesting. I really wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the heads-up.
> 
> I'll ask Michael whether he can come up for a solution for that problem.
> 
> Maybe that's also why systemd crashes.

Do you have a very minimalistic ia64 userspace preferably without systemd where
you could simply test. That should give us an idea whether things work:

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/utsname.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>

#define STACK_SIZE (8 * 1024 * 1024) /* standard stack size for threads in glibc */

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	char *stack;
        pid_t pid;

	stack = mmap(NULL, STACK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
		     MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_STACK, -1, 0);
	if (stack == MAP_FAILED)
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

        /* 
	 * Note that legacy clone() has different argument ordering on
         * different architectures so this won't work everywhere.
         */
        pid = syscall(189 /* __NR_clone2 */, SIGCHLD, stack, STACK_SIZE, NULL, NULL);
        if (pid < 0)
                exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
        if (pid == 0)
                exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
        if (wait(NULL) != pid)
                exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

        exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ