| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200515120111.GV185537@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:01:11 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"wuxu.wu" <wuxu.wu@...wei.com>, Clement Leger <cleger@...ray.eu>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] spi: dw: Add Tx/Rx finish wait methods to the
MID DMA
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:47:41PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Since DMA transfers are performed asynchronously with actual SPI
> transaction, then even if DMA transfers are finished it doesn't mean
> all data is actually pushed to the SPI bus. Some data might still be
> in the controller FIFO. This is specifically true for Tx-only
> transfers. In this case if the next SPI transfer is recharged while
> a tail of the previous one is still in FIFO, we'll loose that tail
> data. In order to fix this lets add the wait procedure of the Tx/Rx
> SPI transfers completion after the corresponding DMA transactions
> are finished.
General question, doesn't spi core provides us some helpers like
spi_delay_exec()?
> Co-developed-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
>
> Changelog v2:
> - Use conditional statement instead of the ternary operator in the ref
> clock getter.
> - Move the patch to the head of the series so one could be picked up to
> the stable kernels as a fix.
You forgot a Fixes tag.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/spi/spi-dw.h | 10 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c
> index 177e1f5ec62b..7a5ae1506365 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@
> #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
Keep it in order.
>
> +#define WAIT_RETRIES 5
> #define RX_BUSY 0
> #define TX_BUSY 1
>
> @@ -141,6 +143,28 @@ static enum dma_slave_buswidth convert_dma_width(u32 dma_width) {
> return DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED;
> }
>
> +static inline bool dw_spi_dma_tx_busy(struct dw_spi *dws)
> +{
> + return !(dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_SR) & SR_TF_EMPT);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_spi_dma_wait_tx_done(struct dw_spi *dws)
> +{
> + int retry = WAIT_RETRIES;
> + unsigned long ns;
> +
> + ns = (NSEC_PER_SEC / spi_get_clk(dws)) * dws->n_bytes * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> + ns *= dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR);
> +
> + while (dw_spi_dma_tx_busy(dws) && retry--)
> + ndelay(ns);
This misses power management for CPU and do you really need this to be atomic?
At the end why not to use readx_poll_timeout() ?
> + if (retry < 0) {
Usually we do
unsigned int retries = NNNN;
do {
...
} while (--retries);
if (!retries)
...
But in any case, see above.
> + dev_err(&dws->master->dev, "Tx hanged up\n");
> + dws->master->cur_msg->status = -EIO;
> + }
> +}
Same comments to Rx part.
> +
> /*
> * dws->dma_chan_busy is set before the dma transfer starts, callback for tx
> * channel will clear a corresponding bit.
> @@ -149,6 +173,8 @@ static void dw_spi_dma_tx_done(void *arg)
> {
> struct dw_spi *dws = arg;
>
> + dw_spi_dma_wait_tx_done(dws);
> +
> clear_bit(TX_BUSY, &dws->dma_chan_busy);
> if (test_bit(RX_BUSY, &dws->dma_chan_busy))
> return;
> @@ -188,6 +214,28 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dw_spi_dma_prepare_tx(struct dw_spi *dws,
> return txdesc;
> }
>
> +static inline bool dw_spi_dma_rx_busy(struct dw_spi *dws)
> +{
> + return !!(dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_SR) & SR_RF_NOT_EMPT);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_spi_dma_wait_rx_done(struct dw_spi *dws)
> +{
> + int retry = WAIT_RETRIES;
> + unsigned long ns;
> +
> + ns = (NSEC_PER_SEC / spi_get_clk(dws)) * dws->n_bytes * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> + ns *= dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFLR);
> +
> + while (dw_spi_dma_rx_busy(dws) && retry--)
> + ndelay(ns);
> +
> + if (retry < 0) {
> + dev_err(&dws->master->dev, "Rx hanged up\n");
> + dws->master->cur_msg->status = -EIO;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * dws->dma_chan_busy is set before the dma transfer starts, callback for rx
> * channel will clear a corresponding bit.
> @@ -196,6 +244,8 @@ static void dw_spi_dma_rx_done(void *arg)
> {
> struct dw_spi *dws = arg;
>
> + dw_spi_dma_wait_rx_done(dws);
> +
> clear_bit(RX_BUSY, &dws->dma_chan_busy);
> if (test_bit(TX_BUSY, &dws->dma_chan_busy))
> return;
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> index e92d43b9a9e6..81364f501b7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,16 @@ static inline void spi_set_clk(struct dw_spi *dws, u16 div)
> dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_BAUDR, div);
> }
>
> +static inline u32 spi_get_clk(struct dw_spi *dws)
> +{
> + u32 div = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_BAUDR);
> +
> + if (!div)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return dws->max_freq / div;
> +}
> +
> /* Disable IRQ bits */
> static inline void spi_mask_intr(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 mask)
> {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists