[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518092318.GA277222@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:23:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, irogers@...gle.com,
kim.phillips@....com, jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/rapl: refactor code for Intel/AMD sharing
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:57:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch modifies the rapl_model struct to include architecture specific
> knowledge to Intel specific structure, and in particular the MSR for
> POWER_UNIT and the rapl_msrs array.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index ece043fb7b494..e98f627a13fa8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ struct rapl_pmus {
> };
>
> struct rapl_model {
> + struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
> unsigned long events;
> + int msr_power_unit;
MSR addresses go negative these days?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists