[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200617010819.GA1004177@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:08:19 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: bcm2835: Fix integer overflow in
rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision()
On (20/06/16 18:42), Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 19:31 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > time64_t is 64-bit width type, we are not supposed to supply lesser ones
> > as in the case of rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision() after the commit
> > 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT"). Use temporary variable
> > of time64_t type to correctly handle lesser types.
> >
> > Fixes: 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT")
[..]
>
> If this doesn't fit the printk tree I don't mind taking it trough the rpi soc
> tree.
I think, for this patch, SoC tree might be a better fit
than printk tree, thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists