[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200703111005.GB3282312@krava>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:10:05 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, guohanjun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report TUI: Fix segmentation fault in
perf_evsel__hists_browse()
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 05:43:22PM +0800, Wei Li wrote:
> The segmentation fault can be reproduced as following steps:
> 1) Executing perf report in tui.
> 2) Typing '/xxxxx' to filter the symbol to get nothing matched.
> 3) Pressing enter with no entry selected.
> Then it will report a segmentation fault.
>
> It is caused by the lack of check of browser->he_selection when
> accessing it's member res_samples in perf_evsel__hists_browse().
>
> These processes are meaningful for specified samples, so we can
> skip these when nothing is selected.
>
> Fixes: 4968ac8fb7c3 ("perf report: Implement browsing of individual samples")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
thanks,
jirka
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> index 487e54ef56a9..2101b6b770d8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> @@ -2288,6 +2288,11 @@ static struct thread *hist_browser__selected_thread(struct hist_browser *browser
> return browser->he_selection->thread;
> }
>
> +static struct res_sample *hist_browser__selected_res_sample(struct hist_browser *browser)
> +{
> + return browser->he_selection ? browser->he_selection->res_samples : NULL;
> +}
> +
> /* Check whether the browser is for 'top' or 'report' */
> static inline bool is_report_browser(void *timer)
> {
> @@ -3357,16 +3362,16 @@ static int perf_evsel__hists_browse(struct evsel *evsel, int nr_events,
> &options[nr_options], NULL, NULL, evsel);
> nr_options += add_res_sample_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options],
> - hist_browser__selected_entry(browser)->res_samples,
> - evsel, A_NORMAL);
> + hist_browser__selected_res_sample(browser),
> + evsel, A_NORMAL);
> nr_options += add_res_sample_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options],
> - hist_browser__selected_entry(browser)->res_samples,
> - evsel, A_ASM);
> + hist_browser__selected_res_sample(browser),
> + evsel, A_ASM);
> nr_options += add_res_sample_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options],
> - hist_browser__selected_entry(browser)->res_samples,
> - evsel, A_SOURCE);
> + hist_browser__selected_res_sample(browser),
> + evsel, A_SOURCE);
> nr_options += add_switch_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options]);
> skip_scripting:
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists