[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZO242FC=O8nAXjKX=9VRpkkQdMA6S0L2ZWNX9D1hmcYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:17:08 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Hoan Tran <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] gpio: dwapb: Convert driver to using the
GPIO-lib-based IRQ-chip
Hi Serge,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:39 AM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru> wrote:
> GPIO-lib provides a ready-to-use interface to initialize an IRQ-chip on
> top of a GPIO chip. It's better from maintainability and readability
> point of view to use one instead of supporting a hand-written Generic
> IRQ-chip-based implementation. Moreover the new implementation won't
> cause much functional overhead but will provide a cleaner driver code.
> All of that makes the DW APB GPIO driver conversion pretty much justified
> especially seeing a tendency of the other GPIO drivers getting converted
> too.
Needless to say I am a big fan of this patch. It's what I wanted to
do with the driver but was afraid to dry-code.
Please look into the minor nits pointed out by Andy and respin,
I really want to apply this patch set.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists