[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9a36dad-e393-83e2-499e-3454f79813c5@phytium.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:09:40 +0800
From: Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Setup exception vector for K210 properly
That is a more reasonable approach.
On 8/12/20 2:45 AM, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:41 AM Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:07 PM Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn> wrote:
>>> Exception vector is missing on nommu platform and it is a big issue.
>>> This patch is tested in Sipeed MAIX Bit Dev Board.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 79b1feba5455 ("RISC-V: Setup exception vector early")
>>> Signed-off-by: Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>
> Thanks for testing it on the kendryte board.
>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 +
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
>>> index 356825a57551..23cde0ceb39d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
>>> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
>>> mmgrab(mm);
>>> current->active_mm = mm;
>>>
>>> + trap_init();
>>> notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid);
>>> update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid);
>>> set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, 1);
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>>> index ad14f4466d92..a390239818ae 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>>> @@ -174,7 +174,16 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long pc)
>>> }
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
>>>
>>> -/* stvec & scratch is already set from head.S */
>>> +/* stvec & scratch is already set from head.S when mmu is enabled */
>>> void trap_init(void)
>>> {
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
>>> + /*
>>> + * Set sup0 scratch register to 0, indicating to exception vector
>>> + * that we are presently executing in the kernel
>>> + */
>>> + csr_write(CSR_SCRATCH, 0);
>>> + /* Set the exception vector address */
>>> + csr_write(CSR_TVEC, &handle_exception);
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.28.0
>>>
>> This issue seems to be only on the latest master branch of
>> Linux stable tree so this fix need not be a stable fix.
>>
>> For MMU kernel, the CSR_TVEC is setup in relocate() function
>> called from secondary_start_common() function of head.S
>>
>> For NoMMU kernel, we should set CSR_TVEC directly in
>> secondary_start_common() function as "#else" case of the
>> "#ifdef CONFIG_MMU".
>>
> That would enable the trap only for secondary harts. But the exception
> vector on boot hart
> is still uninitialized. How about this change ?
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> index d0c5c316e9bb..7822054dbd88 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> @@ -77,16 +77,6 @@ relocate:
> csrw CSR_SATP, a0
> .align 2
> 1:
> - /* Set trap vector to exception handler */
> - la a0, handle_exception
> - csrw CSR_TVEC, a0
> -
> - /*
> - * Set sup0 scratch register to 0, indicating to exception vector that
> - * we are presently executing in kernel.
> - */
> - csrw CSR_SCRATCH, zero
> -
> /* Reload the global pointer */
> .option push
> .option norelax
> @@ -144,9 +134,23 @@ secondary_start_common:
> la a0, swapper_pg_dir
> call relocate
> #endif
> + call setup_trap_vector
> tail smp_callin
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> +.align 2
> +setup_trap_vector:
> + /* Set trap vector to exception handler */
> + la a0, handle_exception
> + csrw CSR_TVEC, a0
> +
> + /*
> + * Set sup0 scratch register to 0, indicating to exception vector that
> + * we are presently executing in kernel.
> + */
> + csrw CSR_SCRATCH, zero
> + ret
> +
> .Lsecondary_park:
> /* We lack SMP support or have too many harts, so park this hart */
> wfi
> @@ -240,6 +244,7 @@ clear_bss_done:
> call relocate
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
> + call setup_trap_vector
> /* Restore C environment */
> la tp, init_task
> sw zero, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Anup
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists