[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb24f7d2-0460-dd3b-1ab3-a9748fa193fe@wp.pl>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 19:07:15 +0200
From: "antoni.przybylik@...pl" <antoni.przybylik@...pl>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: gdm724x: gdm_tty: replaced macro with a
function
On 02.09.2020 18:21, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/2/20 9:16 AM, Antoni Przybylik wrote:
>> Changed return type to bool and removed inline specifier. Also added
>> static specifier.
> why remove the inline specifier?
Greg KH wrote to me:
And really, no need to make it inline, just make it a normal function
and the compiler will inline it if needed.
> thanks.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Antoni Przybylik <antoni.przybylik@...pl>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
>> index 34a13d98c029..179fc9b9400b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(gdm_table_lock);
>> static const char *DRIVER_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCTATC", "GCTDM"};
>> static char *DEVICE_STRING[TTY_MAX_COUNT] = {"GCT-ATC", "GCT-DM"};
>>
>> -inline int gdm_tty_ready(struct gdm *gdm)
>> +static bool gdm_tty_ready(struct gdm *gdm)
>> {
>> return (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count);
>> }
>>
>
Antoni Przybylik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists