linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/24] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add binding for mt8192 IOMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201006071946.GA5759@kozik-lap>
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:19:46 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>, anan.sun@...iatek.com,
        chao.hao@...iatek.com, ming-fan.chen@...iatek.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/24] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add binding for mt8192
 IOMMU

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:26:45PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 13:10 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:06:29PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > This patch adds decriptions for mt8192 IOMMU and SMI.
> > > 
> > > mt8192 also is MTK IOMMU gen2 which uses ARM Short-Descriptor translation
> > > table format. The M4U-SMI HW diagram is as below:
> > > 
> > >                           EMI
> > >                            |
> > >                           M4U
> > >                            |
> > >                       ------------
> > >                        SMI Common
> > >                       ------------
> > >                            |
> > >   +-------+------+------+----------------------+-------+
> > >   |       |      |      |       ......         |       |
> > >   |       |      |      |                      |       |
> > > larb0   larb1  larb2  larb4     ......      larb19   larb20
> > > disp0   disp1   mdp    vdec                   IPE      IPE
> > > 
> > > All the connections are HW fixed, SW can NOT adjust it.
> > > 
> > > mt8192 M4U support 0~16GB iova range. we preassign different engines
> > > into different iova ranges:
> > > 
> > > domain-id  module     iova-range                  larbs
> > >    0       disp        0 ~ 4G                      larb0/1
> > >    1       vcodec      4G ~ 8G                     larb4/5/7
> > >    2       cam/mdp     8G ~ 12G             larb2/9/11/13/14/16/17/18/19/20
> > >    3       CCU0    0x4000_0000 ~ 0x43ff_ffff     larb13: port 9/10
> > >    4       CCU1    0x4400_0000 ~ 0x47ff_ffff     larb14: port 4/5
> > > 
> > > The iova range for CCU0/1(camera control unit) is HW requirement.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml        |   9 +-
> > >  .../mediatek,smi-common.yaml                  |   5 +-
> > >  .../memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml |   3 +-
> > >  include/dt-bindings/memory/mt8192-larb-port.h | 239 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/memory/mt8192-larb-port.h
> > 
> > I see it depends on previous patches but does it have to be within one
> > commit? Is it not bisectable? The memory changes/bindings could go via
> > memory tree if this is split.
> 
> Thanks for the view.
> 
> I can split this into two patchset in next version, one is for iommu and
> the other is for smi.
> 
> Only the patch [18/24] change both the code(iommu and smi). I don't plan
> to split it, and the smi patch[24/24] don't depend on it(won't
> conflict).

It got too late in the cycle, so I am not going to take the 24/24 now.

> 
> since 18/24 also touch the smi code, I expect it could get Acked-by from
> you or Matthias, then Joerg could take it.

Sure. I acked it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof