linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/18] dmaengine: idxd: ims setup for the vdcm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201009124307.GA63643@otc-nc-03>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 05:43:07 -0700
From:   "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
        megha.dey@...el.com, maz@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com,
        yi.l.liu@...el.com, baolu.lu@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        eric.auger@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com, rafael@...nel.org,
        netanelg@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
        yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        samuel.ortiz@...el.com, mona.hossain@...el.com,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/18] dmaengine: idxd: ims setup for the vdcm

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 08:57:37AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 06:22:31PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> 
> > Not randomly put there Jason :-).. There is a good reason for it. 
> 
> Sure the PASID value being associated with the IRQ make sense, but
> combining that register with the interrupt mask is just a compltely
> random thing to do.

Hummm... Not sure what you are complaining.. but in any case giving
hardware a more efficient way to store interrupt entries breaking any
boundaries that maybe implied by the spec is why IMS was defined.

> 
> If this HW was using MSI-X PASID would have been given its own
> register.

Well there is no MSI-X PASID is there?