[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7003f142-5d53-1285-c6cd-a8e8d9c076b7@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:29:05 +0800
From: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<john.garry@...wei.com>, <himanshu.madhani@...ium.com>,
<felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<uma.shankar@...el.com>, <anshuman.gupta@...el.com>,
<animesh.manna@...el.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Introduce a new helper marco
DEFINE_STORE_ATTRIBUTE at seq_file.c
Hi
On 2020/10/22 20:28, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:39:52PM +0800, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
>> We already own DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE() helper macro for defining attribute
>> for read-only file, but we found many of drivers also want a helper marco for
>> read-write file too.
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE is a bloody bad idea; let's not replicate the garbage
> any further. If you want templates - C++ is over that way...
I am sorry but would you mind to explain it in more detail that why
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE is a bad idea?
I found that DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE is convenient and avoids a lot of
duplicate code When add some debugfs file for DFX.
Thanks
Jiaxing
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists