[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <258becba10679166555137c7f2727265@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:37:57 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v3] genirq/irqdomain: Add reference counting to
IRQs
On 2020-11-14 03:37, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> What is the easiest way to get irq-hierarchical hardware?
>>> I have a bunch of powerpc boxes (no good) but also a raspberry pi,
>>> a bunch of 32/64bit orange pi's, an "armada" arm box,
>>> thinkpads - is any of this good for the task?
>>
>> If your HW doesn't require an interrupt hierarchy, run VMs!
>> Booting an arm64 guest with virtual PCI devices will result in
>> hierarchies being created (PCI-MSI -> GIC MSI widget -> GIC).
>
> Absolutely :) But the beauty of ARM is that one can buy an actual ARM
> device for 20$, I have "opi one+ allwinner h6 64bit cortex a53 1GB
> RAM", is it worth using KVM on this device, or is it too small for
> that?
I've run VMs on smaller machines. 256MB of guest RAM is enough to boot
a full blown Debian system with PCI devices, and your AW box should be
up to the task as long as you run a mainline kernel on it. Please don't
add to the pile of junk!
>> You can use KVM, or even bare QEMU on x86 if you are so inclined.
>
> Have a QEMU command line handy for x86/tcg?
/me digs, as my x86 boxes are overspec'd X terminals these days:
Here you go, courtesy of Will:
http://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/will/docs/qemu/qemu-arm64-howto.html
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists