lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201130202110.62e7f989@archlinux>
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:21:10 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:27:56 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> 
> This is a follow-up to commit 750628c79bb1 ("iio: adc: xilinx-xadc: use
> devm_krealloc()"). I noticed we can use even more devres helpers and entirely
> drop the remove() callback.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - squash three patches adding more devres calls into one for easier review
> - don't insist on the 80 characters limit
> - add a new helper: devm_krealloc_array() and use it
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> - drop the devm_krealloc_array() helper
> 
> Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
>   iio: adc: xilinx: use helper variable for &pdev->dev
>   iio: adc: xilinx: use devm_krealloc() instead of kfree() + kcalloc()
>   iio: adc: xilinx: use more devres helpers and remove remove()
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 157 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> 

Series looks good to me but would like to leave it a little longer to let
others take a look at it. That will probably mean it falls into next cycle
now.

+CC Anand who is looking at another series touching this driver and might
give this one a spin as well.

Thanks,

Jonathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ