[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0d6751d-b395-49f4-2411-0ed13e4dabc0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 17:12:47 +0000
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/14] ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver
Hi Sakari
On 02/01/2021 17:07, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>>>>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS 4
>>> This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead?
>> Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and
>> media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the
>> moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from
>> the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h
>>
>> Which do you prefer?
> Seems you got answers already... :-) splitting the header in two seems good
> to me. But IMO it doesn't have to be a part of this set.
>
Yeah I've been hesitating over this; if we chose not to do it in this
set though, how would you want me to deal with the double definition of
CIO2_NUM_PORTS
Powered by blists - more mailing lists