[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <361b118a-f425-2b79-4220-47e3f9c39306@xilinx.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:04:03 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>,
Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"William Breathitt Gray" <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"(Exiting) Amit Kucheria" <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gpio: xilinx: Utilize generic bitmap_get_value and
_set_value
Hi, +Srinivas,
On 27. 12. 20 22:29, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 7:44 AM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch reimplements the xgpio_set_multiple() function in
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c to use the new generic functions:
>> bitmap_get_value() and bitmap_set_value(). The code is now simpler
>> to read and understand. Moreover, instead of looping for each bit
>> in xgpio_set_multiple() function, now we can check each channel at
>> a time and save cycles.
>>
>> Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
>> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
>
> (...)
>
>> +#include <../drivers/gpio/clump_bits.h>
>
> What is this?
>
> Isn't a simple
>
> #include "clump_bits.h"
>
> enough?
>
> We need an ACK from the Xilinx people that they think this
> actually improves the readability and maintainability of their
> driver.
Srinivas is going to send some patches against this driver. That's why
please take a look if both of these changes are fitting together.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists