[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdsTFHY5Yx8y5UHGYqsz=FGevjYn_Kzy-p3kwx-vUxdDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:07:54 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] from x86: Support kmap_local() forced debugging
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 3:53 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:47:02 -0800
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 8:45 PM Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > But there are three other kmap_atomic callers under net/ that do not
> > > loop at all, so assume non-compound pages. In esp_output_head,
> > > esp6_output_head and skb_seq_read. The first two directly use
> > > skb_page_frag_refill, which can allocate compound (but not
> > > __GFP_HIGHMEM) pages, and the third can be inserted with
> > > netfilter xt_string in the path of tcp transmit skbs, which can also
> > > have compound pages. I think that these could similarly access
> > > data beyond the end of the kmap_atomic mapped page. I'll take
> > > a closer look.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Note that I have flushed my random one-liner patch from my system, and
> > expect to get a proper fix through the normal networking pulls.
> >
> > And _if_ the networking people feel that my one-liner was the proper
> > fix, you can use it and add my sign-off if you want to, but it really
> > was more of a "this is the quick ugly fix for testing" rather than
> > anything else.
I do think it is the proper fix as is. If no one else has comments, I
can submit it through the net tree.
It won't address the other issues that became apparent only as a
result of this. I'm preparing separate patches for those.
> Please add:
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210106180132.41dc249d@gandalf.local.home/
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> And if you take Linus's patch, please add my:
>
> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> and if you come up with another patch, please send it to me for testing.
>
> Thanks!
Will do, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists