[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAFpvgfsR/QSTAg+@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:09:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jiapeng Zhong <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: jirislaby@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator
for flags
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:03:51PM +0800, Jiapeng Zhong wrote:
> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
>
> ./drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c:4384:15-16: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |
> ./drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c:4342:39-40: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |
> ./drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c:4280:48-49: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |
> ./drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c:2221:20-21: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Zhong <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
> index c0b384e..d302c08 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
> @@ -2219,7 +2219,7 @@ static void isr_tdma(struct slgt_info *info)
> */
> wr_reg32(info, TDCSR, status); /* clear pending */
>
> - if (status & (BIT5 + BIT4 + BIT3)) {
> + if (status & (BIT5 | BIT4 | BIT3)) {
> // another transmit buffer has completed
> // run bottom half to get more send data from user
> info->pending_bh |= BH_TRANSMIT;
> @@ -4265,7 +4265,9 @@ static void sync_mode(struct slgt_info *info)
> case MGSL_MODE_XSYNC:
> val |= BIT15 + BIT13;
Why didn't you also change this line?
> break;
> - case MGSL_MODE_MONOSYNC: val |= BIT14 + BIT13; break;
> + case MGSL_MODE_MONOSYNC:
> + val |= BIT14 | BIT13;
> + break;
> case MGSL_MODE_BISYNC: val |= BIT15; break;
> case MGSL_MODE_RAW: val |= BIT13; break;
> }
> @@ -4278,7 +4280,9 @@ static void sync_mode(struct slgt_info *info)
> case HDLC_ENCODING_NRZI_MARK: val |= BIT11; break;
> case HDLC_ENCODING_NRZI: val |= BIT11 + BIT10; break;
Or this line?
Seems like you only changed some of these "warnings", why?
Either fix them all or none :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists