linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] software_node: Add kernel-doc comments to exported symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210118103653.GY11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:36:53 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] software_node: Add kernel-doc comments to exported
 symbols

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:33:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:02:09AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> 
> > > + * to_software_node() - Fetch software node associated with a firmware node handle
> > 
> > Please wrap lines over 80 (unless there's a reason to keep them longer).
> 
> Does kernel-doc behave good when you wrap the function summary line?

It does, it's not uncommon to have it split across over multiple lines.

-- 
Sakari Ailus