linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Add AMD_SEV_ES_GUEST Kconfig for including SEV-ES support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f7bbd70-35c3-24ca-7ec5-047c71b16b1f@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:32:07 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Add AMD_SEV_ES_GUEST Kconfig for including
 SEV-ES support

On 18/01/21 21:29, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:25:17PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Introduce a new Kconfig, AMD_SEV_ES_GUEST, to control the inclusion of
>> support for running as an SEV-ES guest.  Pivoting on AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT for
>> guest SEV-ES support is undesirable for host-only kernel builds as
>> AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is also required to enable KVM/host support for SEV and
>> SEV-ES.
> 
> Huh, what?
> 
> I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say here and am not
> convinced why yet another Kconfig symbol is needed?

I think it makes sense because AMD_SEV_ES_GUEST's #VC handling is quite 
a bit of code that you may not want or need.  The commit message does 
need a rewrite though.

Paolo