linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] add generic builtin command line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210216190226.GY22125@fifo99.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:02:26 -0800
From:   Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To:     Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@...pelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, xe-linux-external@...co.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Maksym Kokhan <maksym.kokhan@...ballogic.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] add generic builtin command line

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:32:01AM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 15:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > The patches (or some version of them) are already in linux-next,
> > > > which messes me up.  I'll disable them for now.
> > >  
> > > Those are from my tree, but I remove them when you picked up the series. The
> > > next linux-next should not have them.
> > 
> > Yup, thanks, all looks good now.
> 
> This patchset is currently neither in mainline nor in -next. May I ask
> what happened to it? Thanks.
> 

It was dropped silently by Andrew at some point. I wasn't watching -next closely
to know when. I have no idea why he dropped it.

We still use this series extensively in Cisco, and have extended it beyond this
current series.

We can re-submit.

Daniel